THE INFLUENCE OF MANIPULATIVE TOYS TO MATH LEARNING OUTCOMES OF 6-7 YEARS OLD
CHILDREN (AN EXPERIMENT IN 1TH CLASS OF TELUK PUCUNG ASRI VIII ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN BEKASI)
Pupung Puspa Ardini,M.Pd
An Early Childhood Education Lecturer
Of
Gorontalo State University
ABSTRACT; Mathematics
is the based of knowledge that children
will find everyday. The application
of this science was unconsciously do every day even when playing.
However, in educational institutions,
especially schools, learning math become a scourge that is very difficult. Thus, the study was conducted aiming to obtain
empirical data on the effect of manipulative toys of mathematics
learning outcomes of children aged
6-7 years old. The method used in this study is to
design experiments Randomized control group
pretest-posttest. Data collection techniques using the techniques of written test with objective form
fields. After doing
analysis of data,
the conclusion there are differences in
mathematics learning outcomes of children who are
given manipulative toys and
without manipulative toys. Thus, therefore to
enhance the mathematical
learning of children aged 6-7 years old, educators need to provide a means of manipulative play in
the classroom. Then the material is delivered with a child involving the
active use of tools such games.
Key words: the study of mathematics, manipulative
toys, children aged 6-7 year
INTRODUCTION
Mathematics is a system of quantitative thinking that is a
development of thinking
skills. Mathematics can shape
a person become more
disciplined in your thinking, because
in it there is a systematic steps to solve a
problem. Without realizing it, children
will always encounter the mathematics everyday. Such as pouring a glass of water, the child
will use the mathematical
sciences, namely an estimate
or predict which
will occupy a
glass of water. Thus man can not escape the math.
But
the reality that exists in society, mathematics has always been a frightening
specter. Mathematics lesson that is feared to be causing the child's learning outcomes
has declined. This is caused by some unscrupulous educators who sometimes pay
less attention to the development of student learner characteristics, which in
this case is the early childhood. Thus, educators sometimes pay less attention
to the stages that must be given a developmentally appropriate early childhood,
especially children aged 6-7 years. At this age according to Piaget, cognitive stages
children are still in pre-concrete operational stage. At this stage of the
child still requires concrete objects and fun method of obtaining information
about a concept. Educators do more for the transfer of information in the form
of knowledge without regard to the understanding and the application in daily life
as a stage of the process of children's cognitive domain that is being
developed. Thus the cognitive development of children less than optimal.
Besides mathematical
material delivered only by using the lecture method and doing the questions in writing only, so
that children are less eager to learn. Implementation
strategies varied learning and fun for
children can be done through play. This is
in accordance with any principles
of early childhood learning,
by learning through
play. This is so the child's
long-term memory can
be more easily aroused to receive and store
information. According to Woolfolk,
information would easily be absorbed if
the source of information to the
attention of the child. Therefore,
researchers interested in studying the influence
of manipulative toys for math learning
outcomes of children aged 6-7
years.
DISCUSS
A. Mathematics Learning Outcomes
1.Learning Outcomes
According to Abdurrahman, the results obtained by studying the
ability of a person after going through the learning activities
(1996:31). According to Sudjana, learning outcomes are shown the results
after a learning experience (2005:5). According to Waluyo,
the results of learning are learning the value
determined by the assessment or measurement of learning
in the learning process or a specific time
(1997:20). Activity measurement was carried out to measure the success
of the children receiving the information when teaching and learning
activities take place.
It can be concluded that learning outcomes are
the results obtained after the child through the
learning experience. The results were
determined through measurement
when the learning process takes
place or a particular time.
Learning outcomes can be influenced by
several factors both
internal and external. Internal factors consist of physical
and psychological. Physical factors include
physical health. Psychological
factors include intelligence,
interests, talents, motivation, and maturity. External
factors consist of the curriculum,
interaction with teachers,
environmental conditions are conducive
and effective, and
the community. These factors
include the child's
activity, the role of the media,
friends hanging out, and forms of community
life in the environment around
the child.
2.Mathematics
According to Copeland, mathematics is a quantitative thinking as developing the ability to find, create, test, and generalize (1994:112). Mathematics is not only concerned with numbers, but it is a set of ideas and principles that can understand and relate to each other. According to Johnson and Myklebust in Abdurrahman, the symbolic language of mathematics is a practical function to express the quantitative relations and spatial (1996:217). According to Bakhtiar, mathematics is a language that represents a set of meanings of a series of statements to be conveyed (2004:188).
According to Copeland, mathematics is a quantitative thinking as developing the ability to find, create, test, and generalize (1994:112). Mathematics is not only concerned with numbers, but it is a set of ideas and principles that can understand and relate to each other. According to Johnson and Myklebust in Abdurrahman, the symbolic language of mathematics is a practical function to express the quantitative relations and spatial (1996:217). According to Bakhtiar, mathematics is a language that represents a set of meanings of a series of statements to be conveyed (2004:188).
Based on some
previous statements can be concluded that, mathematics
is a symbolic language
that is a result
of the development of quantitative thinking ability
to discover, create, test, and generalize
to express quantitative
relations and spatial.
According
to Burn and Lorton, mathematics for early childhood has three stages,
including: (1) understanding the concept stage, (2) phase transition, (3) phase
of the introduction of symbol number (2000:22). Understanding of the concept
stage is the initial stage of the child to obtain information about
mathematical concepts. At this stage of early childhood, particularly children
aged 6-7 years will be introduced to mathematical concepts through concrete
objects, because the cognitive stage of pre-operational children are still
concrete. At this stage of understanding the concept, the child will get to
know eight-track mathematics, including numbers (arithmetic), patterns and
functions, geometry, graph metrics, estimation, probability, and problem
solving (2000:2).
The
second stage is the intermediate stage of understanding the concept with the
introduction of the symbol number. At this stage students begin to connect the
concrete objects with mathematical symbols. For example, there are two pictures
of umbrellas are connected by two-digit symbol. The third stage is the stage
number symbol. At this stage the children have started to use mathematical
symbols and no longer using objects to make the concept concret.
According to Marks, the
delivery of material for early childhood mathematics should consider some basic
principles, such as readiness to learn, inquiry and discovery, emphasis on the
stages of learning math, comprehension, exercising regularly and periodically,
a variety of activities, exercises that are rational, the application of ( 1988:26).
Educators must consider the child's readiness to
learn, that educators must be sensitive to children's readiness to receive the
material. This relates to the characteristics of child development. any
mathematical material to be presented must be adjusted to the characteristics
of child development to match the capabilities of the child.
The principle is the
principle of investigation and discovery relating to the learning process. When
children are involved active learning implemented in the process of
investigation and discovery problem solving maths problems. The principle of
emphasis on the stages of learning mathematics, is a principle that must be
considered when drawing up the material gradually from the simple and basic to
the more difficult and complex. The principle of understanding the principles
for educators to always pay attention to the situation of children. attention
to the child's level of understanding in more depth before proceeding to the
next math materials.
Principle
of exercising regularly and periodically, and are rational, that is the
principle for educators to always provide opportunities for children to
practice solving math problems. Training provided should be appropriate to the
material that has been given and in accordance with the stages of child
development. The material is presented to the children's attention and is
easily absorbed and settled in the child's long-term memory, then the material
is delivered through a variety of activities such as using a game and do not
forget the material obtained is applied in everyday life.
3.Mathematics
Learning Outcomes
Based
on previous exposure to mathematical learning outcomes are the results obtained
by the child after receiving the information or knowledge of mathematics (2006:
6). So that optimal results can then mathematics, mathematics learning outcomes
can be measured using the cognitive classification, taxonomy model of bloom.
This model includes six aspects, including: (1) remember / knowledge, (2)
Comprehension, (3) application, (4) analysis, (5) evaluation, (6) creat (2004:
237).
According
Arikunto used to evaluate elementary school students only consists of three
levels, namely knowledge, comprehension, and application. This is based on the
taxonomic classification for the order shows that the more serious business
(2006: 121). For example, for understanding, students can first remember or
know the return (2005: 165). To measure the learning outcomes of mathematics
can be done through a written test techniques.
B.Manipulative Toys
Manipulation
play is a
play activity
by using certain
tools as
a complement to
foster children's
special abilities
such as mathematical
ability. Manipulative
according Tedjasaputra
is an activity
to use something
skillfully. Something
that can
be made is
treated according
to the
will and
the mind
or the
imagination of
children who
do (2001:
82).
According Sudono,
manipulative
toys are
toys that
can be used
to develop
children's cognitive.
These toys
consist of
all toys
with small
size and
can be played
on a table (2000:
128). According
Montesori, "manipulative
toys are
the toys
illustrate Concept
That Such
as large
and small,
hot cold,
loud and soft,
and so on"
Tools manipulative
game is
a tool used by
children to
acquire a
knowledge of an
understanding of
the concept of learning
(www.
michelolaf.com,
2005,
retrieved September 2010).
Based on previous
exposure, it
can be manipulative
plaything is
a small
game and
is played on
a table that can
be used to
obtain a
concept of
knowledge so
as to develop children's
cognitive and
train students
skill.
Manipulative
toys has
several features,
including: (1)
means the
game can
stimulate students
to actively
participate
in the process of
playing, (2)
unstructured
toy form,
(3) toys
made has
a purpose for
a particular
development
(www.indosiar.com-news-htm,
2005,
retrieved September 2010).
Manipulative
toys have some condition that the child is assured of safety and comfort when
playing with these toys. These terms include, (1) can be used in a constructive
way or that can be made in various forms, (2) intended for children over the age
of 1.5 years, and serves to develop the various aspects of development, (3)
made of materials that are safe for children, not sharp and use a non-toxic
paint, (4) the child is actively involved or do something (1992: 43).
Some
manipulative toys can be used to develop simple mathematical ideas for young
children especially ages 6-7 years (1992: 18). Among them some toys, peg boards
that can be used to convey the concept of arithmetic or numeracy and the
introduction of simple statistics. In addition to the peg board game equipment
that could be used to convey the concept of arithmetic is a set of beads as
ronce. The beads can also help educators convey the concept of patterns and
functions based on the pattern of colors or shapes, sizes concepts, the concept
of estimation or forecast, and the concept of probability. Lego, blocks and
puzzles, can be used by educators to develop the concept of geometry and
mathematics problem solving (www.michelolaf.com, 2005, retrieved September
2010).
C.Cognitive development
of 6-7 Year-Olds
According to Piaget,
children aged 6-7 years are in pre-operational stage of cognitive development
of concrete (1996: 58). According to Hughes, children aged 6-7 years had some
characteristics of cognitive development, including: (1) wholeheartedly devote
attention and work that is intellectual, (2) imagination soar, (3) capable of
performing the operation count to five, ( 4) can be demonstrated using one hand
five, (5) can count to 30 (1993: 2).
According to Hurlock,
children aged 6-7 years have the characteristics of cognitive development,
including: (1) is able to recognize numbers up to five hundred in stages, (2)
recognize the value of the place, (3) has the ability to recognize the concepts
in math concepts such as addition and subtraction, the concept of calculating
the mixture, the concept of multiplication, and division, the concept of built
space, broad concepts, the concept of time, (5) able to classify objects
according to the story, (6) is able to play the puzzle (1999: 20).
According to Armstrong,
there are some characteristics of the cognitive development of children aged
6-7 years, including: (1) the child can calculate arithmetic problems quickly
by rote, (2) enjoy the computer language
CONCLUSION
The results of this study concluded that
there are differences in mathematics
learning outcomes of children aged
6-7 years are in
the process of delivery of content
using a math manipulative
games with games
that do not use manipulative tool. It appears that mathematics
can be developed through active learning and
fun to use tool
permainan.Dalam this, educators should enhance
the learning techniques are more varied use of
the game. Educators also need to prepare for a
game device in accordance with the material to be delivered so right on target. Effectiveness of time is
also worth noting that the material
presented can be further optimized
and thoroughly.Thus
mathematics may be
a fun lesson and
eagerly awaited by young children,particularly children aged 6-7 years.
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
Abdurrahman, Mulyono. Pendidikan Bagi anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta : Departemen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1996.
Cohen, David. The Development of Play. London : Routledge, 1993.
Copeland, W. Richard. How Children Learns Mathematics. New York : Mc Millan Publishing
Co, Inc, 1994.
Griffiths, Rose. Bermatematika Sambil Bermain. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama,
1992.
Hughes, Fergus P. Children, Play, and Development. Massachusetts : Simon ang
Schuster,Inc, 1993.
Hurlock, Elizabeth B. Perkembangan Anak Jilid II. Jakarta : Erlangga, 1999.
Jr, Philips John L. The Origins of Intellect Piagets Theory. San Fransisco : Freeman
and Company, 1996.
Marks, John L. Metode Pengajaran Matematika untuk Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta :
Erlangga, 1988.
Munandar, Utami S.C. kreativitas dan Keberbakatan. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama,
2004.
Paige, Donald D, et.all. Elementary Mathematical Methods. Canada: John Wiley and sons,1992.
Sudjana, Nana. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya,
2005.
Sudono, Anggani. Sumber Belajar dan Alat Permainan. Jakarta : PT. Grasindo,2000.
Sujiono, Yuliani Nurani. Kurikulum Alternatif Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta : Pusdiani Press,
2002.
Tedjasaputra, Mayke S. Bermain, Mainan, dan Permainan. Jakarta : Gramedia Widiasarana
Indonesia, 2001.
Waluyo, H.Y. Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajari. Jakarta : Karunika, 1997.
Wortham, Sue
C. Assesment in Early Childhood Education.New Jersey : Pearson, 2005
www.indosiar.com-news-htm,
diunduh pada 25 September 2010
www.michelolaf.com, diunduh pada 25 September
2010.
Zulkifli. Psikologi
Perkembangan. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 1992.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar